EQUALITY 4 MEN

The Global Campaign for Men and Boys

10 reasons German Socialist wants Europe to ban male circumcision….

2474095194_e8aa8c69a4

The German politician Marelene Rupprecht, is leading the campaign to ban unnecessary male circumcision across Europe. Rupprecht is a member of the mainstream Socialist Democratic Party and has persuaded the Council of Europe , which represents 47 member states across Europe, to support her campaign to end unnecessary male circumcision in Europe.

Here are the 10 main reasons that Rupprecht gives for ending unnecessary male circumcision taken from her memorandum on circumcision  to the Council of Europe:

1. Male Circumcision Can and Does Kill Boys and Young Men

The most compelling argument against medically unnecessary circumcision is that it can and does kill boys young men such as Goodluck Caubergs from Salford and the dozens of young men who die from ritual circumcision in South Africa every year. Rupprecht’s report lists a range of complications that boys can suffer as a result of medically unnecessary circumcision and concludes that “some of the complications are regularly fatal”.

2. Male Circumcision Causes Unnecessary Pain and Trauma

Rupprecht challenges the “erroneous belief” that very young children are not yet as sensitive to pain as older children or adults and that their pain can be relieved with local anaesthetic creams. She says: “there is scientific evidence that the pain suppressing system of children is only operational a few months after birth, and that a newborn child feels more pain than an adult.  Medical studies have also shown that analgesic treatment available for small children (who are too young for general anaesthetics) do generally not have the intended effect, and are not recommended for children under 12 years of age anyway. The increased pain perception by young children and the lack of effective pain treatment for infants are, from my point of view, amongst the main arguments against circumcision of young boys, as they can be traumatising for the child.”

3. Male Circumcision Causes Unnecessary Damage to Men and Boys

Rupprecht’s report states that: “there is evidence that unprofessional circumcisions may cause infections, organ curvatures, perforated urethra and, finally, additional operations, whilst even wrongly applied bandages can have severe consequences such as necrotic tissue and other irreversible damage.”

4. Male Circumcision Is Not Medically Necessary

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has been promoting male circumcision in the fight against HIV /AIDS but medical experts are increasingly questioning the validity of this approach, according to Rupprecht. The circumcision of boys for medical reasons is also critically viewed and increasingly being replaced by alternatives across Europe, she says.

5. Male Circumcision Is a Human Rights Violation

Rupprechts says that “circumcision applied to young boys clearly is a human rights violation against children” and adds that  “from an ethical point of view…infant circumcision applied in a routine manner is increasingly considered as an infringement of the human rights of a child, in particular if carried out by non-medically trained persons and in a non-sterile environment… as very often happens in the religious context.”

6. Male Circumcision Is Not a Religious Absolute

According to Rupprecht’s report: “more and more Jewish families seem to question the traditional ritual of circumcision today.” She points to the Jewish Circumcision Resource Center created by Jews who “openly call on Jews to listen to and feel the intense pain of the children, and the denied pain of the adults that they become, in order to realise that circumcision does not necessarily serve the best interest of the child or the community of Jews.” Rupprecht adds that: “the tradition is also increasingly questioned by members of the Muslim community” saying that “critical Muslims regularly point out that no sura of the Koran indicates an obligation to circumcise” and that Islam scientists are divided over the question of whether circumcision truly is an obligation or a simple recommendation.

7. Male Circumcision Without A Boy’s Consent Is Wrong

Rupprecht is one of a group of parliamentarians in Germany who believe that boys should not be circumcised until they reach the age of 14 and  only if he has given his consent. In addition, Rupprecht asserts that the circumcision should always be carried out by a paediatric surgeon or urologist.

8. There Are Medical Alternatives to Male Circumcision

Rupprecht says that “in the medical context, there is increasing evidence that the operation is often applied too rapidly and alternatives are not sufficiently considered”. What this means is that paediatricians and urologists are often quick to circumcise  boys when a cream or a less invasive operation would suffice.

9. There Are Religious Alternatives to Male Circumcision

Rupprecht says that alternative rituals to circumcision are regularly being considered  in religious contexts, particularly within the Jewish community where some families opt for an alternative ritual, sometimes referred to as a “naming ceremony” or “bris shalom”.

10. Male Circumcision Is Unregulated Across Europe

According to Rupprecht  “both medical professionals and religious communities are increasingly aware of the considerable harm inflicted on children through circumcision procedures, especially if performed in a routine, traditional manner”. She says that in some countries there is a large consensus that minimum standards need to be guaranteed to ensure that male circumcision is carried out in healthy and safe conditions” but that this is not the case in many European countries.

As a first step to tackling problems relating to unnecessary male circumcision Rupprecht has proposed that all European governments examine the prevalence of unnecessary male circumcision in the UK and “clearly define the medical, sanitary and other conditions to be ensured for practices which are today widely carried out in certain religious communities, such as the non-medically justified circumcision of young boys”.

If you think boys of all backgrounds should be protected from unnecessary male circumcision they why not join our campaign to #StopTheChop today.

Photo courtesy of Flickr/miss_pupik

Advertisements

7 comments on “10 reasons German Socialist wants Europe to ban male circumcision….

  1. Pingback: Male circumcision is a human rights violation that must be stopped say European leaders…. | EQUALITY 4 MEN

  2. Pingback: Good news on male genital mutilation in Europe? |

  3. Pingback: Låt pojkarna bestämma | En stilla undran

  4. Greg Hartley
    October 4, 2013

    Von einem Schnitt American Mann des deutschen Erbes: Vielen Dank!

  5. Pingback: 10 reasons German Socialist wants Europe to ban male circumcision…. | EQUALITY 4 MEN | Social Care Work Consultancy

  6. Eifelginster
    January 5, 2014

    Germany:
    Activists File Complaint Against § 1631d BGB

    December 2013 – German intactivist movement tries to tackle circumcision law

    Since december 2012 a circumcision law (§ 1631d BGB) principally allows parents to circumcize their son as desired. Now activists against HGM or any ritual mutilation (i. e. FGM and MGM) have written a petition to The German Supreme Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) demanding that the § 1631d BGB is declared as not being in accordance with the German constitution. Instead they call for an end of all circumcisions done without medical necessity.

    27. Dezember 2013
    an das
    Bundesverfassungsgericht
    Karlsruhe

    Beschwerde gegen das Bundesgesetz über den Umfang der Personensorge bei einer Beschneidung des männlichen Kindes

    Die Beschwerdeführer legen daher gegen dieses Gesetz Beschwerde ein und beantragen durch eine einstweilige Anordnung nach § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG diese Vorschrift sofort außer Kraft zu setzen, um alle medizinisch nicht erforderlichen Beschneidungen, insbesondere Rituale wie Metzitzah B’Peh, pria und Praktiken wie im folgenden Link beschrieben, die sicherlich mit einer Zirkumzision lege artis nicht zu vereinbaren sind, trotzdem aber durchgeführt werden, zu verbieten bis das hohe Gericht über die Verfassungsbeschwerde entschieden hat.

    Die Beschwerdeführer beantragen zudem, die nicht medizinisch indizierte MGM an nicht einwilligungs- und urteilsfähigen Jungen auf die Liste der Auslandsstraftaten zu setzen, um sowohl Beschneidungstourismus zu verhindern als auch die gegebenenfalls erforderliche Strafverfolgung ortsunabhängig zu gewährleisten.

  7. Pingback: Council of Europe says circumcision violates children’s right to bodily integrity. Reaction of biased media | CircWatch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: